XIII F: Role of Mathematics behind seemingly trivial but intricate soap bubbles.
[Contd. A Journey to the Wonderland of Math.by Ajay Kumar Chaudhuri.]
Soap bubbles are no longer a matter of child`s play today but a gate way of an intricate mathematical world to be explored.
[To continue]
Reference Internet:
Images are downloaded from Public Domain.
[Contd. A Journey to the Wonderland of Math.by Ajay Kumar Chaudhuri.]
Soap bubbles are no longer a matter of child`s play today but a gate way of an intricate mathematical world to be explored.
Nearly all of us have been
enchanted sometimes in our lives by fragile smmetry of soap bubbles and soap
films. It seems trivial and a matter of child’s play, but really not so. It is
a form of natural pattern and has therapeutic, designing and architectural uses
at present. But we have had no privilege of being introduced to them by a great
scientist.
In this context, it may be said
that art and science become inevitably intertwined in our appreciation of
nature’s forms. Physics play a role in striking aesthetic impact of bubble
patterns. Furthermore, the foams exhibit a balance between similarity and
intricacy that symbolizes many of the complex systems that permeate nature and
society.
Galileo Galilei’s famous
declaration: “Nature’s great book is written in mathematical symbols”, suggests
that key to unlocking nature’s secret lies in underlying science, quantifying
the geometrical specifications behind nature’s pattern often provides step in
discovering ‘how’ and ‘why’ of their formations. Interestingly, it might also
serve as the springboard for explaining their aesthetic value. We might be
drawn to nature’s pattern because they are direct manifestation of natural laws
that dictate our lives. In this way, art and science become inevitably intertwined
in our application of nature’s forms.
Now, let us come to the pattern
of bubbles and foams. What rules drive bubble formation? Soap bubbles serve as
the perfect illustration of physical objects striving to minimize their surface
area. For example, the beautiful simplicity of a spherical soap bubble occurs
because this is the optimal shape for enclosing a given volume of air, within a
surface with a minimal area. Whereas this fundamental fact has been known for
several centuries, science becomes more challenging as the number of bubbles
increases. Consequently, foams consisting of many bubbles feature more
intricate shapes compared to the simple sphere of isolated bubbles. [Pic. No.
20a: Foam bubbles]
Pic.NO20a.
Foam bubbles.
The search for
the pattern that most efficiently packs bubbles into foam is known as “Kelvin
Problem” after the name of the great Scottish physicist and also a mathematician
and engineer Lord Kelvin also called Sir William Thomson (1824 – 1907), who
profoundly influenced scientific thoughts of his generation. He was the first
to focus on this challenge back in 1887. But what was that challenge?
The challenge is : to find an
arrangement of cells or bubbles of equal volumes, so that total surface area of
the walls between is as small as possible, in other words, to find the most
efficient soap bubble foam. The problem is relevant to bone replacement
materials because bone tissues has a honeycomb – like structure, called
Kelvin’s Structure which you will get when you cut the corners off a three
dimensional diamond shape. In this context it will be worthy to mention that
this structure may lead to advancement in uses like hip replacement and
replacement of bone tissues for bone cancer patients.
Kelvin’s structure believed to be
the most efficient solution of over 100 years until physicists Denis Weaire of
Trinity College, Dublin and his student Robert Phelan found a better structure
than that of Kelvin’s in 1993 using computer Simulation which is now known as
“Weaire- Phelan structure”.
This structure since become
etched into public’s memory for reasons beyond its unique packing properties,
fame spread into the field of architecture and its distinctive form appeared on
the TV screen across the globe when the structure served as the inspiration for
design of the Beijing National Aquatic Centre for 2008 Olympic swimming venue
in Beijing, China.
The foam pattern of that water
cube is shaped by more than 22,000 steel beams. It measures 177 meters long,
177 meters wide and 30 meters high and cover an area of 62,950 sq. meters. It
has four floors. The resulting structural system is inherently strong and light
weight. The frame work fills a large volume of space with a reduced amount of
materials similar to a hexagon in two dimensions.
Many researchers after Weaire
and Phelan have applied their minds for betterment of the foam pattern
structures. The study of foams, seems to be a subject poised very delicately
between complexity and symmetry and one in which final word has not yet been
said. [Pic. No.-20b: Water cube of Beijing Olympic]
Pic. No.-20b
Water cube in Beijing Olympic.[To continue]
Reference Internet:
Images are downloaded from Public Domain.
No comments:
Post a Comment